Delhi High Court Rejects Petition on Illegal Migrants' Deportation

The Delhi High Court has recently ruled against a petition that sought to compel authorities to identify and deport individuals alleged to be illegal migrants residing in the national capital. The court's decision was based on the observation that the petitioner had not provided any specific evidence or identified any individuals who could be classified as illegal migrants. The division bench emphasized that courts are not in a position to issue broad directives based on vague claims that lack substantiation. The ruling underscores the necessity for concrete evidence when making serious allegations regarding immigration status.

During the proceedings, the bench heard arguments from both sides, including a response from the Delhi Police, which stated that no formal complaint had been lodged by the petitioner regarding the supposed presence of illegal migrants. Furthermore, the police conducted a local inquiry in the area mentioned by the petitioner and reported that their investigation did not uncover any evidence of illegal migrants. The court highlighted that without specific facts or credible evidence, it cannot mandate authorities to engage in a widespread search and deportation effort. The judges pointed out that such an action would resemble a 'fishing and roving inquiry,' which is not permissible under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution.